While a part of people has definite and real demands due to economic pressures and subsistence problems, the very repeated scenario is again executing; a scenario during which the legitimate economic opposition is ending in violence and restless meddling with disturbing organized movements and Persian spoken foreign media such as the BBC Farsi and Iran International are playing a media operation room of this deviation.
The experiences of the previous years’ riots have shown that whenever the economic demands of people reach, the social emergence point, a net including foreign media, the Baha’i activists, the elements of Monafegqin and monarchist movements enter into the field to change the course of opposition depending on Instagram and Telegram.
In this process, the interior and exterior public thoughts are aimed by deviating reality, omitting the role of rioters, changing place of victim and the accused one and inducing the narration of “repressing” the peaceful opposition.
This media line is repeating in the current adventure, too using the very pattern.
The hostile media and riot project; from Persian speaking networks to cyber infantry:
The investigation of the function of Persian spoken [1] foreign media shows that what is following confronting the current economic oppositions is not “the news coverage”, but implementing a media purposeful project to change the opposition nature and pushing it towards riot.[1] [2]
In this framework, the media such as the Persian BBC, Iran International and other aligned networks are trying to separate economic opposition from its social field to change it into a sign of security and political crisis by selective choice of subjects and high lighting specific images.
This media project is not merely restricted to satellite news networks, but at the same time the social media particularly Instagram and Telegram are acting as the fisted arm of foreign media and the western intelligent service organizations and deviant groups.
The contents shown by these spaces include fragmented videos, images without background, emotional narrations and intriguing call which are republished immediately by the foreign media in the form of “news”. This cycle is practically destroying the border between producing content and media operation.
The remarkable note is that the role the cyber organized activists is bold. The networks related to the Baha’i movements, Monafeghin elements and monarchists in Instagram and Telegram are acting as the infantries of riot project.
Making and sending the contents purposefully for the foreign media, these groups are trying to stabilize their desirable narration as the dominant one. A narration in which the “repressed” economic opposition and riot is introduced as “the democratic demand”.
The experiences of the previous years have shown that the foreign media have always used this pattern; first making the space hot is the social media and then changing cyber content into news food and eventually inducing the single narration into interior and exterior the single narration into public thoughts. [2] [3] In the current circumstances, this course is being passed, too, but the difference is that special focus on joining bazar, economy and economic opposition with restless and insecurity.
In such conditions, what is followed by the hostile media is not solving the economic problems of people, but is exploiting the dissatisfactions in maximum level to proceed the project of destabilization.
Recognizing this media mechanism is the necessary condition to separate legitimate opposition from organized riot and to return the economic demands to its real course whose exact understanding needs referring to field narrations and documented reports.
The Persian BBC and Iran International; the main columns of the media operation room of riot:
Among the hostile media view and foreign Persian speaking media, the Persian BBC and Iran International have positions beyond news media. The functions of these two media show that their roles are defined in planning and directing riot narration news media show actions of these les not in reflecting reality.
Determining the news framework, selecting special subjects, omitting selective realities and calculated timing of publishing content have changed the Persian BBC and Iran International into the main columns of riot media operation room.[3] [4]
These two media are trying to represent the economic oppositions as a sign of as a sign of “the political Collapse” and “the security crisis” exploiting overt and covert supports of the western governments specially America and the Zionistic regime.
In this course, each riot, destruction and violence is censored or justified in the form of “the natural reaction of people” against tyranny and violence of the governmental forces. forces. This is the very point which the medium is changed into mental operation.
So, the Persian BBC and Iran International must be considered as media arm but not media whose planning is done out boilers in the course of American and Israeli interests.[4] [5]
The single narration, the common resources; why do all hostile media repeat a story?
Synchronism and clear similarity of narrations titles, and even words used by the hostile media and Persian speaking media abroad are not accidental or merely professional. This consonance is indicating the dependence on common news resources and the circulation of a single media food. A food which is being provided and purified in the social media particularly Instagram and Telegram before being published in satellite antenna.
In this circle, the role of Baha’i organized networks, Monafeghin elements and monarchist activists is determinative. Producing contents, these movements send purposeful videos, select special video angles, present sentimental narrations and provide news raw materials for the hostile media.
Without independent verification, the media reproduce these contents in the form of report, analysis or “objection testimony”. The result is a single and repeating narration in which riot is always called “peaceful opposition”.
The remarkable note is that in this single narration, the key elements of reality is systematically omitted or deviated. The role of rioters, destruction of public properties, threatening the security of market, people’s economy and the presence of organized movements are ignored or margined. In contrast, is confronting against riot is considered as “repression” and insecurity as “social demand”. This pattern repeated in the previous years’ riots.
Stabilizing this story in the public thoughts, the hostile media provide political media and judicial pressures in the international level, too. In this framework, medium a loop of a chain of coordinated project not reflecting reality. A project which can’t continue and reproduce without Baha’i networks, Mensfeghin and monarchists.[5] [6]
The Baha’i media; the arm of producing narration and sending contents purposefully:
After forming “single narration” in hostile media and Persian Speaking media abroad, the basic question is that where and how the food of this narration is provided. The exact investigation of content production circle shows that Bahaism [7] is not merely a marginal and theological movement, but it plays an influential role in providing news raw materials as an active media and field network.[6] [8]
The experience of the previous years’ riots has also shown that wherever the Baha’i networks have been more active, the speed and volume of media narration making have increased. In this perspective, Bahaism must be considered as one of the hidden but influential arms of the media operation room of the riot; an arm whose application is defined not at street, but in image frame, narration and cognitive war.[7] [9]
From rioters to monarchists; the field actors of medium project of riot:
Although these two movements are different in background and discourse, but in riot field they are acting as complementary arms of a single project.[8] [10]
These two movements are acting in complete coordination with the hostile media supported indirectly by America and the Zionistic regime. Monaffeghin inflame the field and monarchists are making its political narrations.[9] [11]
Instagram and Telegram; the main field of mental operation and surfing on the economic oppositions:
In riot media project, Instagram and Telegram aren’t merely the means for communicative means or social media, but they are the main field for mental operations. In these spaces, the real economic opposition is redefined purposefully and is propelled towards riot and inconsistency from social demands. The contents produced in these networks are not accidental, but are the result of organized movements’ planning and directing.[10] [12]
In such atmosphere, riot is displayed as “the democratic opposition” and violence as “the natural reaction”. This is the very point where analysis is replaced by mental operation.
Keep in touch with us: bahaismiran85@gmail.com [13]
[۱] [14] Fars correspondence, analytic reports about the role of foreign media in riots.
[۲] [15] Tasnim correspondence, media cases concerning the war narrations and social media.
[۳] [16] Mehr correspondence, the analytic reports about the function of the Persian BBC and Iran International
[۴] [17] IRNA correspondence, the analytic cases about the role of hostile media and the war of narrations.
[۵] [18] Tasnim correspondence, the case of the war of narrations and the role of organized movements.
[۶] [19] Fars correspondence, analytic reports about the organizational role of Bahaism in media projects
[۷] [20] Mehr correspondence, the analytic cases about the cognitive war and sectarian nets in riots.
[۸] [21] Tasnim correspondence, the analytic reports about the role of Monafeghin in riots and field war.
[۹] [22] Fars Correspondence, the analytic cases concerning monarchists and political alternativeization project
[۱۰] [23] Mehr correspondence, the analytic reports concerning the role of social networks in mental operation of riots.