The indirect negotiations between Iran and America in Oman have been reacted by Bahaism organization and related foundations extensively in the cyberspace and social media.
This report investigates the most basic presented issues and critical resources backgrounds:
I) Criticizing the leadership and negotiating team:
Erfan Sabeti, the Baha’i proselytizer, has accused the Iranian leaders to dictatorship and demagogy
Iraghchi, the respectful minister of foreign affairs has been introduced as the symbol of “ready-made, clergyman, manly” and his policies have been jested.
II) Emphasizing on human rights and religious freedoms:
The U.S. Baha’i office of public affairs (USBahaiOPA) and the US. commission for religious freedom (USCIRF) has asked for human rights to be included in in the negotiations.
Trump has been introduced as the “peaceful” leader by the Baha’is “who is going to make the Iranian people happy and advanced.”
III) The role of women and separating national interests from the system of the government.
The Baha’i girlish schools and the modern university of Ecuador have been introduced as a means for recruiting women and preaching oneness of human being.
Trying to separate national interest from the Iranian system of government using slogans such as “permanent peace” and” sexual justice”.
IV) Predicting threats and being afraid of negotiations:
Warning “Israel and Iran war show” failing the negotiations.
Pouyan Makri has mentioned decreasing dollar price as “aboriginal success of negotiations”.
V) The reciprocal accusations and uproars:
The Baha’is ask the Iranian opposition to pose people’s claims at streets, but some consider these measures as “pretext for foreign meddling”.
Publishing rumors by “the Iranian cyber army” has been introduced has as a means for repressing human rights activists.
White the Bahaism organization has introduced the slogan of not meddling one meddling with policy as one of pillars of the activity of this organization.
Keep in touch with us: bahaismiran85@gmail.com
