The brand of quarrel against each critic is a sledge caused to down on their critics by the Baha’is and the Bahaism organization. They condemn him/her to quarrel against the Baha’is in advance and they consider reading his/her criticism not to be needed.
It is not merited for a divine creed to consider each criticism as quarrel and each independent research including rejection of Bahaism views as the letter of rejection and quarrel.
Escaping from criticism is a scourge that make people and groups to become despotic and bigoted and will end in congelation, absolutism and stagnancy. There isn’t any difference between its religious and social ones, but the religious one is more dangerous; because they consider the critic to be eliminated having the brand of excommunication.
Of course, the scientific criticism has its own principles, method and formalities which is different from good-for-nothing, demolition and partial behavior. A scientific criticism contains a research which is documented to discover reality and to state hidden facts in the texts and behaviors of founders and the claimants of a thought. All of its propositions are documented. Such criticism is worthy to be read.
Paying attention to a correct criticism is duty for a reality seeker and this critics’ attempts must be acknowledged, too because the explanatory attempts of him/her will make others aware. As if, he/she is in trouble to seek reality instead of others to show the path to independent investigators of truth.
The term quarreler used for such critic is quite unfair and insults him/her and is rejected totally by the common sense.
The Bahaism organization calls critics quarreler and fights against them. It calls the inner critics as unsavory elements and banishes them and it can’t tolerate the exterior critics and asks the Baha’is not to study their materials called by the Baha’is as letters of rejections or quarrel worthy to be burnt.
This middle-aged behavior of the Baha’is has made a selfish figure pertaining to a party which is quite obvious in the recent criticisms of inner critics such as Joan Cole, Francesco Ficiccia, Karen Bacquet, Sobhi, Ayati, Sabet Rasekh, Adib Masoudi and etc. who have been banished due to their criticisms.
Escaping from criticism means the end of a thought. The more Bahaism organization proceeds in this regard and Banishes critics and makes them isolated and notorious, the more it sinks in absolutism vortex.
We suggest to the Baha’i elements to make themselves get rid of the orders of the leadership of Bahaism which pertain to party and read criticisms from the ex-Baha’is and non-Baha’i ones and evaluate the critics’ words via thought and research and set terms like the letters of rejection and quarrel aside and behave and judge fairly that what Bahaism is originally from?
Is it a cult?
Is it organization?
Is it a religion?! and…
Keep in touch with us: bahaismiran85@gmail.com
