During the recent years, the media related to the Baha’i organization published two so-called independent news having opposed the contents about the Jewish.
One of them was related to the anniversary of the explosion of Amia center in Argentina and the other was about Lord David Alliance’s death, the Iranian Jewish and the British influential businessman who had a close relationship with the Zionistic regime.
The remarkable thing is the Baha’i media’s approach which was the continuation the policies of Iran phobia and the political and cultural Zionism in practice more than being the reflection of “the oneness of humane world”. In the report about the explosion of Amia center, the Baha’i organization stressed on the absent trial of ten leaders from Iran and Hezbullah of Lebanon narrated by the judicial system Argentina and didn’t point out the judicial and political threatening.
The criticisms posed by the families of victims, the warnings of “the active memory” association concerning the absent proceedings to be unfair and concerns about political exploitation from the court are totally ignored.
On the other side, the media coverage of this event has been changed into a means for legitimizing the western accusations against Iran and reproducing the image of “a terroristic government”.
In contrast, the news coverage of Lord David Alliance’s death presents a romantic, neutral and positive image of a figure who has played a key role in supporting the Zionistic regime.
This direct relationship with transferring the Ethiopian Jewish to Israel, his negotiations with the dictator of Ethiopia, establishing the Iranian studies center in Tel Aviv university and even his burial place in the occupied lands have been all censored.
In contrast, Alliance is praised for being “the lover of Iran”, “cultural benevolent” and ” the preacher of dialogues among nations”.
A selected image from an extremely political and controversial figure who has been active in the depth of Zionistic and anti-Iranian structures.
This contradiction indicates a dual policy of media foundations related to Bahaism confronting Jewish and Israeli issues.
Each kind of claimed relationship between Iran and resistance group as “terrorism” is condemned in one side and in other side the direct relationship with the military and intelligent service of Israel and helping occupy Palestine is censored.
In this framework, it seems “justice”, “the lack of bigotry” and “being ultra-political” are not the central principles of Bahaism, but they are merely decorative slogans used to gain moral fare in the universal public thoughts.
Amia explosion report is in fact considered as a part of political media pressure against the Islamic Republic of Iran while the elimination of Zionist activities of Alliance assumed, as a kind of compurgation of figures close to the occupier regime of Israel.
Consequently, this conditions indicate that these foundations are in practice playing the role of the soft arm of anti-Iranian movements and the Zionistic projects in the region.
Keep in touch with us: bahaismiran85@gmail.com
