Can branches and differences be an indicators of falsehood? Listen to Abdul Baha’s answer: “If two persons debate about the divine problems and conflict, both are false.” According to this principle, can differences and branches which happen in Babism and Bahaism be considered as the reasons for both sides’ falsehood?!
You knew that differences were created over the Bob’s succession between Bahaullah and his brother. Some were in favor of Mirza Yahya Sobhi Azal and called him their leader who were called “Azalis and another group accepted Mirza Hussein Ali Nouri’s claim and were called Baha’is and a group followed Mirza Asadullah Dayani and were known as Dayanis. Another people merely considered the book Bayan and got famous as “Bayanis”.
However; among the Baha’is and according to Bahaullah’s will, his first son Abbas and then his another son Muhammad Ali were to become his successors. Nevertheless, both of them conflicted and Abbas considered Muhammad Ali to be in lack of competence and he assumed himself as inheritor of his father’s position and contrary to his father’s will, he deposed Muhammad Ali completely.
Abbas (Abdul Baha) called himself and his followers as Sabetin (covenanted) and Muhammad Ali and his followers as Naghezin (covenant-breakers). After Abdul Baha, there were differences over his succession. When he died, he didn’t have any son and his daughter’s son became the leader of the Baha’is.
After his ancestor’s death, Shoghi Effendi distributed a will and called himself as Abdul Baha’s successor, but some Baha’is headed by Ahmad Sohrabi considered it as forged and cheated and were branched as “Sohrabis” out of Baha’is.
According to Abdul Baha’s will and order, the Bahaism leadership must remain in Shoghi Effendi’s descendants inheritably, but contrary to Bahaullah and Abdul Baha’s predictions, Shogi Effendi was abortive. In 1336, he died in London due to Influenza which is doubtful by some.
After Shoghi’s death, there was a severe conflict among the Baha’is for his succession. Many Baha’is accepted the leadership of his American wife called “Rouhiyeh Maxwell!
She continued Bahaism leadership through a group called “Ayadian Amrullah”. Eventually, several years later; in a conference in London, the establishment of the universal house of justice as the leadership of Bahaism was announced and nine and people were elected as the members of the universal house of justice. Its place was determined in Haifa, Israel headed by Rouhieh Maxwell. She died in January, 2000.
After the conference of London and the election of the members of the universal house of justice, a group of Baha’is introduced an American called” Charles Masson Remey” who was determined of the disciples of God’s faith by Shoghi Effendi as the first person after him as the successor of Shoghi Effendi and the leader of the Baha’is. They were separated from the Baha’is under the title of “Reymeys.
Charles Masson Remey had travelled across the world and the centers of gathering and influence of the Baha’is twice on half of Shogi Effendi. The followers of Charles Masson Remey have considered him as the fifth leader of the Baha’is of the world and entitled him as Azizullah and the second guardian of the faith.
Now, the wise addressee should judge: Even according to the clear text of this Zionistic organization, is Bahaism originated from falsehood or not?
This proposition proves that this cult is quite false and null.
By: Abdul Hussein Fakhkhari
Keep in touch with us: bahaismiran85@gmail.com
