The self-proclaimed prophet of Baha’ism has in the book Aqdas appointed the residential house as share of inheritance for male offspring; but Abdul Baha has deviant his father’s commandment and limited it to the elder male offspring! However, how is it possible to be believed that it isn’t related to the fact that he is the eldest male offspring of Hussein Ali Nouri?!
Now, the question is tat: why have the commandments of Baha’ism been profited by the Baha’i leaders?!
The self-proclaimed prophet of Baha’ism has appointed the residential house as the share of inheritance for the male elder offspring in the book Aqdas:
“وَ جَعَلنا الدارَ المَسکُونة و الألبسه المَخصُوصة لِلذُرِّیة مِن الذُکران دُونَ الإناث و الوُراث إنَّهُ لَهُو المُعطی الفَیاض”
“We have appointed the residential house and the dead person’s special cloths for the male offspring …[۱]”
While, Abdul Baha has changed the commandment without any reason and has considered the dead person’s residential house belonged to the elder male offspring…[۲]”
The Baha’i proselytizer: HE has been the explanatory of Bahaullah’s commandments and he mean the eldest son!
Researcher: Explanation means this is Abdul Baha’s duty to clarity the vagueness of the self-proclaimed Baha’i prophet’s speech. Is limiting the male offspring to the eldest son explanation or deviation?! Should we believe that deviation of this commandment isn’t related to this issue that Abdul Baha has been Bahaullah’s eldest son?!
[۱] Hussein Ali Nouri, the Aqdas, the electronic copy, p. 23, paragraph 25.
[۲] Ishraq Khawari, the treasury of limitations and commandments, the electronic copy, p. 128.
