The Baha’i medium which calls on people against the government by the name of freedom and with the excuse of Mahsa Amini’s death; although the forged prophet of Baha’ism has forbidden his follower to ask for liberty and has called it savagery! The Baha’i medium has called for freedom while the self-proclaimed prophet of Baha’ism introduced freedom in obeying his orders and considered his order as equal to mere obedience of the government!
Amid riots of Shahrivar and Mehr 1401 S.H. in Iran which was started with the excuse of Mahsa Amini’s death in the educational center of police, the elements of the Baha’ism organization tried to blow in sedition and riot fire. Amid one of the pages of the Baha’ism organization called the rioters for freedom of Iran by publishing a post of an unveiled woman standing on Azadi tower.[1]
However, how do the elements of the Baha’ism organization invite people to confront against the government by the name of freedom while the self-proclaimed prophet of Baha’ism has severely prohibited liberalism, and has likened it as an inextinguishable sedition!
He has said:
“انّ الحریة تنتهی عواقبها إلی الفتنة الّتی لاتخمد نارها…”[۲]
Hussein Ali Nouri considered freedom as obeying his orders:
“قُل الحریّة في اتباع أوامری لو أنتم من العارفین…”[۳]
Referring to the book Aqdas, we will figure out that opposing the rulers has been prohibited and opposing the government isn’t equal to freedom:
“لَیسَ لِأحَدٍ أن یَتَعَرَّضَ عَلی الَّذین یَحکُمون عَلی العِباد دَعُوا عِندَهُم و تَوَجَّهوا إلی القُلوب”[۴]
Consequently, the self-proclaimed prophet of Baha’ism has considered opposing the government as the evidence of brutality! How is it possible for the organizational leaders who self-proclaimed prophet considers opposing the government as equal to being animal allow themselves to ask their followers and the Iranian people for riot by the name of freedom?!
[۱] Narrated by one of the Instagram pages of the Baha’ism organization
[۲] Hussein Ali Nouri, the Aqdas, the electronic copy, pp. 116-117, paragraph 123.
[۳] Ibid.
[۴] Ibid, p. 93, paragraph 95.
