کد خبر:9433
پ
abdulbaha2
Bahaismiran

Abdul Baha and the scope of his deviant thought

The cult which couldn’t be successful even using the Colonialism spearhead force is claiming for the expansion of Islam due to sword and for the expansion of Baha’ism using discourse! However, why have the Baha’i leaders prevented their followers to debate with the aware opponents of Baha’ism if the speech and logic of Baha’ism is […]

The cult which couldn’t be successful even using the Colonialism spearhead force is claiming for the expansion of Islam due to sword and for the expansion of Baha’ism using discourse! However, why have the Baha’i leaders prevented their followers to debate with the aware opponents of Baha’ism if the speech and logic of Baha’ism is so influential?!!!

In some parts of Tarazullah Samandari’s book, we read: “A person said to the Excellency Abdul Baha is the influence of the word Allah sharper than Muhammad’s sword? He said: yes, that sword kills but this one inspires. That one destroys, this one improves. That one disarrays but this one retrieves…[۱]

The answer to calling Islam as violent and introducing Baha’ism as discourse:

  1. Contrary to Abdul Baha’s claim concerning the expansion of Islam by sword it should be said that it is impossible for imposing cordial beliefs by force and sword and sword is influential in physical movements not in thoughts and beliefs; additionally, those who are illogical will resort to force and sword not the religion of Islam. So, the holy prophet’s wars were done to prevent and defense not for making people Muslims forcefully.
  2. Baha’is is claiming for the expansion of it via discourse while the self-proclaimed prophet of Baha’ism was one of the heads of terroristic group of Babism in Iran who was trying to impose himself to the Iranian community using the weapon force. Even after he was exiled, he was killing his opponents in Iraq[2]. Nevertheless apart from violence and killing opponents in Baha’ism[3], inviting to violence and brutality is a theological principle in Baha’ism.

So, inviting to violence against opponents by Hussein Ali Nouri[4] or the verdict of brutal boycott and general sanction against the opponents and ex-Baha’is are examples of the lack of logic and discourse in Baha’ism.[5]

Eventually, it should be said that why will not the Baha’i leaders allow the aware opponents of Baha’ism to debate with their followers if they consider Baha’ism speech and logic as influential?!!![6]

[۱] Trazullah Samandari, the divine level, narrated by the Baha’i network, Vol. 1, p. 362.

[۲] Refer to Ezzieh Nouri, Tanbihunnaemin, the faithful with the Bayan, the electronic copy, pp. 11-12.

[۳] For more studies refer to the article: What did the Baha’i killers do in Iran?

[۴] Refer to Hussein Ali Nouri, the highest pen works, the electronic copy, Vol. 2, p. 89.

[۵] Refer to Helen Allenbi, the guidance lights, the electronic copy, p. 230, No. 604.

[۶] Refer to Abbas Effendi, some excerpts from the book Makatib, Bija, Bina, 1984 A.D., Vol. 2, p. 37.

Bahaism in Iran
ارسال دیدگاهYour Comment

Your email address will not be published.

کلید مقابل را فعال کنید Active This Button Please