کد خبر:17081
پ
The holy Quran and tradition in Bahaism documents

The holy Quran and tradition in Bahaism documents

      After being aware of what the Baha’is have made about the number 19, I decided to search in Bahaism documents to achieve the root of this damned tree and to know this cult’s view towards the holy Quran and tradition.       Bab Shirazi had said in the book “Bayan” that the holy prophet (P.H.) […]

      After being aware of what the Baha’is have made about the number 19, I decided to search in Bahaism documents to achieve the root of this damned tree and to know this cult’s view towards the holy Quran and tradition.

      Bab Shirazi had said in the book “Bayan” that the holy prophet (P.H.) has given good news about the next prophet like all previous prophets, but it has been remained hidden from his nation. Of course, he never presented his reason for this claim.

      Baha Mazandarani continued his master’s job, but he tried to concentrate on false interpretation of the verses related to the day of judgment in order for these to give good news about his emergence. In the book Ighan, he tried more to cite the Bible and the old Testament and used the traditions less. When he wanted to cite the tradition, he exploited the following tradition to prove the date of his emergence:

إِذَا ظَهَرَتْ رَايَةُ الْحَقِّ لَعَنَهَا أَهْلُ الْشَّرِقِ وَ الْغَرِبِ»”

      In the book Aqhdas, Bahaullah developed from prophethood to divinity citing the holy Quran and tradition weren’t needed.

      After Baha, Golpaygani used the holy Quran, the Bible and the old Testament in the book “AL- Hojajel Bahiyoch” to interpret the Ighan and cited the traditions less and considered Baha’s good news of emergence in the holy Quran as a reason for sincerity of the holy Quran. He repeated Baha’s statement which said traditions are full of emergence signs, but he rejected narrating and citing them.

 

      The holy Quran in modern secularism:

      After disappearing of the Baha’is who were proselytizing explicitly, the modern secularism emerged and proselytized the scientific miracle of the holy Quran and the secret of the number 19 for their ridiculous words. They considered these findings as reasons for sincerity of the holy Quran.

      Concerning tradition, modern secularism was different from the Bahaism one. They believed in each tradition which is in accordance with new emergence signs is a true one and the rest of the traditions are forged; additionally, seculars believe that the holy prophet knew none of the things they knew in the holy Quran and he is just a mediator who has transferred what has been inspired to him and all verses are irrelevant with the Exultancy Muhammad’s (P.H.) essence. As if they negate the relationship between inspiration and verses and the events of these days.

      Then, they appointed the year for ending the world and were delighted due to this discovery and ignored d all traditions in which the holy prophet prohibits his followers to be amazed by numerical computations of the holy Quran.

 

      The holy Quran, Islam and tradition in the modern books of Bahaism:

      The evil fruit of the cursed tree of the book “the electronic (computer) secrets of the number 19” was printed twice and the name of the author was different in each edition. In the first edition, Dr. Muhammad Rashad Khalifeh and the center for publishing the Islamic compilation association in America were in charge and in the second edition, the name Muhammad was omitted and the name of the author was written as Rashed Khalifeh, the Imam of Tosan mosque and the mosque was the publisher.

      In the second edition of the book, two advertisements had been printed in the last pages of the book: The first one for the first book of the doctor and the second one for the book of this person.

      The advertisement text is as follows: Do you know why are three million Israelis able to defeat 150 million Arabs and to deprive them of their mosque in Jerusalem? If you want to know about this issue, read the book “the holy Quran, tradition and Islam” by Dr. Rashad.

      This book has been written in English and as if the association is not quite going to publish it in Muslim lands unit it provides opportunities for it.

      In the beginning of the book, the author writes that after electronic discoveries with the holy Quran, I achieved this spiritual discovery that the holy Quran is in fact said by holy Imams and I became famous more than before and figured out that tradition is not related to Excellency Muhammad (P.H.) and insisting on them disobeying the divine orders.

      My word is different from Muslim beliefs and it is possible it will endanger my life; because and I realized that saying this word to Muslims is similar to this statement said to the Christians that Jesus is not God’s offspring, but since all material evidence and those of the holy Quran are reasons proving my statements, all people who possess freedom of thought believe in these beliefs and they bring feeling of awakening and freedom for them and will figure out that the Muslim nation have been sacrificed by the satanic plans.

      He points out two verses indicating bonding tradition is false (Anam: 112-Forqan:31)

      Rashad Khalifeh rejects his statement that had said we had hundreds of correct traditions and ten thousand false traditions are existent in a matter entitled “the traditions after the holy prophet don’t belong to him”.

      He says all traditions are satanic plans to deviate and mislead the nation towards idolatry. To mislead people, he gives Bokhari who has been born 200 years after the holy prophet as an example.

      He says Bokhari asks a man: Do you hear a tradition from the holy prophet? And that man says: Yes, I heard from whom he has heard from his ancestor that… such and such has said that he has heard from the holy prophet… and he was narrating the tradition. Bokhari’s documents and the narrators of his book traditions are eight generations of the dead.

      The Imam of Tosan mosque who doesn’t know the difference between “Medad (the pen)” and “Madad (the aid)” and has translated both as “ink” has allowed himself to interpret the holy Quran based on his will in order to value the emergence.

He is claiming for Muslims to turn to idolatry by cherishing the holy prophet (P.H.) and attributing to traditions is practicing polytheism.

By: Ayesheh Bent Al-Shati

Source: Reading Bahaism documents, pp. 53-57.

 

Keep in touch with us:  bahaismiran85@gmail.com

 

 

Bahaism in Iran
ارسال دیدگاه

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

کلید مقابل را فعال کنید