All the divine prophets have been polite human beings according to history testament and narration left by the previous authors and compilers. Of course, one of the features of the self-proclaimed prophets of Babism and Baha’ism has been their impoliteness, which has been recorded in the history.
How is it possible that Abdul Baha has considered the fulfillment of educating human beings as one of the reasons for the legitimacy of the divine prophets while contrary to this claim the self-proclaimed prophet of Baha’ism has been unable to educate his offspring and they fought over succession. These offspring of the false claimant called each other as roach, worm, bat, crow, fox, wolf, calf and donkey!
According to Abdul Baha’s claim “If we want to know whether the prophets have been teachers or not, we should investigate the truth independently. If they have educated the souls and had made them approach the highest rank, they have surely been right. Nobody can reject it.[1]”
It shouldn’t be forgotten that Abdul Baha has described the African people as: “The people of a land such as Africa resemble to wild animals which are stupid and wild. There isn’t any knowledgeable person among them.
He has also said: “If human being is left in the nature, he/she will be worse than animal. Like the African people… look at African people! They are inferior to animals.”
So; due to the above-mentioned statements, the Baha’i cult doesn’t possess legitimacy!
[۱] Ishraq Khawari, the message of heaven, India: Bina, 1986 A.D., p. 203.
