Contrary to his interpretation concerning the Day of Judgment and its attribution to the emergence of prophets, the self-proclaimed prophet of Baha’is has promised fire for his opponents. Consequently, what is his justification for this contradiction?!
The Baha’i proselytizers states regarding the subject of the day of judgment in the deviant cult of Baha’ism view: “Our leader, Bahaullah, has presented an interpretation which is against your imagination of the day of judgment. He has interpreted the day of judgment as the emergence of new religions.[1]”
It should be answered that isn’t it true that your self-proclaimed prophet has promised hell for his opponents:
” تالله لَن يقبل اليوم من أحدٍ شيئ إلّا بعد حُبّه و كَفى الله بِذلک لَشَهيد و خَبير…”
“I swear by God, today nothing is being accepted except for being affectionate with God (that is Bahaullah) and God is enough as evidence…[۲]”
However, the self-proclaimed prophet of Baha’ism has prohibited his followers to interpret his speech.[3]
Now, it is surprising for Abdul Baha to shout the slogan of quitting all prejudices: “We are trying for this cherished aim (quitting all prejudices)… but others are just speaking[4]; while his father is rejecting his opponents’ actions and considering them as merited for fire! Isn’t it a contradiction in the son and father’s views.
[۱] Refer to J. Esslement, Bahaullah and the new era, translated by Bashir Elahi, Soleimani and Rahimi, Brazil: Manshurat Dar Al-Nashr Al-Bahaiyeh Fi Brazil, 1998 A.D. pp. 29-30.
[۲] Hussein Ali Nouri, the works of the highest pen, Canada: The Baha’I knowledge institute, 3rd edition, 2002 A.D., tablet 81, pp. 474-475.
[۳] Abdul Hamid Ishraq Khawari, the treasury of limitations and commandments, the electronic copy, p. 341.
[۴] Abdul Hamid Ishraq Khawari, the message of heavens, the electronic copy, p. 99.
